CFD:er är komplexa instrument som innebär hög risk att du förlorar pengar snabbt på grund av hävstången. 74% av icke-professionella investerares konton förlorar pengar när de handlar med CFD:er hos den här leverantören. Du bör överväga om du förstår hur CFD:er fungerar och om du har råd att ta den höga risken att förlora dina pengar.
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Tisdag Sep 30 2025 00:00
2 min
Former US President Donald Trump stated on Monday that he would impose a 100% tariff on all foreign-made films, an unprecedented move that could reshape Hollywood's global business landscape. This move signals Trump's intent to extend his protectionist trade policies to cultural industries, creating uncertainty for film production companies heavily reliant on international revenue and cross-border co-productions.
Trump announced the measure in a post on his social media platform, 'Truth Social,' claiming the American film industry is losing out to international competition. He wrote: 'Our film production industry is being taken from us by other countries, as easy as taking candy from a baby.'
However, it remains unclear what legal authority Trump would invoke to impose the 100% tariff. The White House has not immediately responded to Reuters' request for comment on how the tariff would be implemented. Warner Bros Discovery (WBD), Comcast (CMCSA), Paramount Skydance (PSKY), and Netflix (NFLX) also have not immediately responded.
In May, Trump first floated the idea of imposing a film tariff but did not provide many details, leaving entertainment industry executives unsure whether the tariff would target specific countries or all imported films.
Film company executives told Reuters earlier this year they were 'confused' about how a film tariff would be implemented, as modern film production, financing, post-production, and visual effects often span multiple countries. This raises questions about how films made in co-production with foreign companies would be categorized.
The announcement has drawn questions from legal and trade analysts. Some argue that films fall under the category of intellectual property, which is also part of global services trade, where the US typically runs a surplus. This makes the legal basis for imposing the tariff questionable.
Furthermore, the increasing prevalence of co-production with foreign film companies further complicates the issue of how such films would be classified.
'On its face, it's shocking, and it almost means the movie business shuts down,' one industry insider previously told CNN. 'But the reality is, he doesn't have the authority to do it, and it's too complicated to implement.'
If implemented, this measure would potentially lead to a significant shift in the global film industry. American production companies would have to reassess their international strategies, and there might be an increased reliance on domestic production. It could also lead to an increase in film production costs, potentially impacting the quality of content delivered to audiences.
Questions remain about how this tariff would impact international trade agreements and whether it would lead to similar retaliatory measures from other countries. It's clear that this issue requires careful consideration and strategic thinking from all parties involved.
Risk Warning and Disclaimer: This article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform. Trading Contracts for Difference (CFDs) involves high leverage and significant risks. Before making any trading decisions, we recommend consulting a professional financial advisor to assess your financial situation and risk tolerance. Any trading decisions based on this article are at your own risk.